﻿<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Financial Statement School: Recent Comments</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com</link><description /><generator>Quick Blogcast</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:17:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Comment on Return on Assets or "ROA"</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/09/16/return-on-assets-or-roa.aspx#comment-11839324</link><dc:creator>Ken Pirok</dc:creator><description>Another way to look at ROA is to use earnings before interest after tax (or “EBIAT”) in the numerator.  The effect of this change is to remove the effect of leverage (or more precisely the effect of interest expense) on the ratio.  You might do this to create a measurement that includes all resources available to both debt and equity-holders.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/09/16/return-on-assets-or-roa.aspx#comment-11839324</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:02:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Price/Earnings or “P/E” Ratio</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/12/25/priceearnings-or-pe-ratio.aspx#comment-6383169</link><dc:creator>Ken Pirok</dc:creator><description>Also, keep in mind that, since EPS is affected by the capital structure of a company, so is the P/E ratio.  It is not appropriate to compare P/E ratios of companies with different degrees of leverage.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/12/25/priceearnings-or-pe-ratio.aspx#comment-6383169</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:34:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Earnings per Share or “EPS”</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/11/10/earnings-per-share-or-eps.aspx#comment-6383121</link><dc:creator>Ken Pirok</dc:creator><description>EPS is not comparable among multiple firms unless those firms have similar capital structures, because changes or differences in leverage affect EPS all else being equal.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/11/10/earnings-per-share-or-eps.aspx#comment-6383121</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:31:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Straight Line Depreciation</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2010/11/16/straight-line-depreciation.aspx#comment-3997707</link><dc:creator>Ken Pirok</dc:creator><description>Here is an example.  Let's say that you buy a vehicle for $20,000.  You believe that the useful life of this vehicle is five years, and you assume that you can sell it for $5,000 at the end of its useful life.  The annual straight line depreciation is, therefore, $3,000 or (20,000-5,000)/5.  The monthly straight line depreciation would be $250 or (20,000-5,000)/(12*5).</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2010/11/16/straight-line-depreciation.aspx#comment-3997707</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:30:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Profitability, Efficiency, and Operating Ratios</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/09/08/profitability-efficiency-and-operating-ratios.aspx#comment-3997700</link><dc:creator>Ken Pirok</dc:creator><description>Return on Sales is another measure of profitability and efficiency.  Return on sales is similar to net profit margin except that interest and taxes are added back to the numerator:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Return on Sales = &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Net Income before interest and income taxes&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Net Revenue</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/09/08/profitability-efficiency-and-operating-ratios.aspx#comment-3997700</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:28:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Cap Rate from the Appraiser's Perspective</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2009/11/15/cap-rate-from-the-appraisers-perspective.aspx#comment-3528057</link><dc:creator>realbench</dc:creator><description>I personally like the cap rate return calculation because it allows investors measure the earning ability of an investment. Your post gives an a different angle on how to employ it further.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Good post</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2009/11/15/cap-rate-from-the-appraisers-perspective.aspx#comment-3528057</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:58:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Cash Basis versus Accrual Basis Accounting</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/06/24/cash-basis-versus-accrual-basis-accounting.aspx#comment-3273235</link><dc:creator>Accountant career</dc:creator><description>Nice overview of these differences between cash and accrual.  One easy way to see corporate financial statements translated into "cash basis" is by looking at the statement of cash flows. It may not be exactly a cash basis financial statement but conceptually it helps you achieve your objectives.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/06/24/cash-basis-versus-accrual-basis-accounting.aspx#comment-3273235</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:15:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Balance Sheet</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/06/02/balance-sheet.aspx#comment-3261608</link><dc:creator>Ken Pirok</dc:creator><description>Here is an interesting balance sheet explanation and example:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.accountingelf.com/how-to-read-a-balance-sheet/"&gt;http://www.accountingelf.com/how-to-read-a-balance-sheet/&lt;/a&gt;</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/06/02/balance-sheet.aspx#comment-3261608</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:23:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Senior Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/08/01/senior-debt-to-tangible-net-worth-ratio.aspx#comment-3112415</link><dc:creator>Debt to equity ratio</dc:creator><description>A debt equity ratio of 1 might be regarded as middle-strong, but a debt/equity ratio of 8 is precarious.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/08/01/senior-debt-to-tangible-net-worth-ratio.aspx#comment-3112415</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:57:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Return on Assets or "ROA"</title><link>http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/09/16/return-on-assets-or-roa.aspx#comment-3019742</link><dc:creator>Ken Pirok</dc:creator><description>If the period of time over which you are measuring the ROA is characterized by significant asset growth with return on those assets anticipated in future periods, then the ROA may turn out to be less than you would expect.  For example, a company that is growing its inventory for future sales may have a relatively lower ROA.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://financialstatementschool.com/2008/09/16/return-on-assets-or-roa.aspx#comment-3019742</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:02:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
